Court stops HYBE representative from repeatedly mentioning ‘independent management’

Court stops HYBE representative from repeatedly mentioning ‘independent management’

Join Our Telegram Channel

The court stopped HYBE’s representatives from repeatedly mentioning ‘independent management’ and asked them to present their arguments based on legal principles. Even if it is true that ‘managing the company with shamans’ or ‘seducing NewJeans’ parents’ can’t be a basis to prove that usurpation of management rights, that is, breach of trust, is a legitimate reason to fire CEO Min, as stated by HYBE.

1. I guess that’s all the HYBE representative had to say

2. Look at the low level of these HYBE ba$tards

3. The court told them to present legal evidence, but they kept talking nonsense, so the court told them to stop?

4. I think the court will be upset because they keep spreading nonsense

5. Do they really have nothing but shamans and KakaoTalk?

6. They didn’t provide any evidence of a breach of trust and just made a lot of comments saying it was a breach of trust

7. Why are they obsessed with shamans? ㄷㄷ Is that the reason?

8. Do they think the court will listen to what they say?

9. They are too stupid to say anything

10. They do this because they can’t provide legal evidence

11. The fact that they did that in court means they were trying to kill Min Heejin without any evidence

12. HYBE could not find any evidence of a breach of trust

13. I guess they really don’t have any evidence of a breach of trust

Original post (1)